THE PERCEPTION OF SOCIETY ON JUDICIAL CANING AS THE FORM IMPLEMENTATION OF QANUN JINAYAH (PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE)
Abstract
The implementation of a rule and form of punishment to create a safe and prosperous society will have an effect and impact on the fabric of social life. The implementation of judicial caning stipulated in the Qanun Jinayah has gained diverse views from society. The purpose of this study was to determine how society's perceptions of the implementation of judicial caning. This study used a qualitative method with observation and focus group techniques. A total of 31 people from 3 (three) regions in Banda Aceh City were selected as research respondents using purposive sampling techniques. The results point out that the perceptions that arise from the society are influenced by knowledge and views on judicial caning and its implementation as well as the psychosocial conditions of the society. Society does not quite understand the nature of Jinayah law, the purpose of punishment, and the order as well as the law to be realized. On the other hand, society also considers that judicial caning can provide a deterrent effect and learning to the society so that it does not violate the Sharia law.
Downloads
References
Abbas, S. (2011). Dimensi pemikiran hukum dalam implementasi Syariat Islam di Aceh. Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh.
Ablisar, M. (2014). Relevansi hukuman cambuk sebagai salah satu bentuk pemidanaan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14 (2), 278-289.
Abubakar, A. (2012). Kontroversi hukuman cambuk. Media Syari’ah, 14 (1), 65-95.
Ananda, R. R. (2016). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap pelaksanaan hukum cambuk di Kota Banda Aceh. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas FISIPOL Universitas Syiah Kuala.
Blake, R., & Sekuler, R. (2006). Perception. New York: McGraw Hill.
Danial. (2012). Qanun Jinayah Aceh dan perlindungan HAM (kajian yuridis-filosofis). Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 6 (1), 85-98.
Dinas Syari’at Islam Aceh. (2015). Hukum jinayah dan hukum acara jinayah. Banda Aceh: Naskah Aceh.
Feener, F. M. (2013). Social engineering through shari’a: Islamic law and state-directed da’wa in contemporary Aceh. Indonesia Law Review, 3 (3), 285-310.
Fikar, M., & Mutiarin, D. (2014). Tata kelola kebijakan Qanun Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Maisir (Perjudian) di kabupaten Gayo Lues provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan Publik, 1 (3), 548-572.
Goldstein, E. B. (2013). Sensation and perception (9th ed.). USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. (2017). Hukuman cambuk mencoreng wajah hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from http://icjr.or.id/hukuman-cambuk-mencoreng-wajah-hak-asasi-manusia-di-indonesia/.
Irwanto. (2002). Psikologi umum (buku panduan mahasiswa). Jakarta: PT. Prehallindo.
Jabbar & Hanum, Z. (2018). Pengawasan pelaksanaan uqubah cambuk. Legitimasi, 7 (2), 265-283.
Mahdi. (2011). Sistem hukum penegakan Qanun Jinayah di Aceh. Media Syariah, 13 (2), 179-192.
Mazrieva, E. (2017). Kontroversi hukuman cambuk di Aceh. VOA Indonesia. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/aceh-hukum-cambuk-pasangan-gay-/3867986.html.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Muhammadin, F. M., Wicaksono, D. A., Sari, A. C. F., & Ayutama, O. A. (2019). Lashing in qanun Aceh and the convention against torture: A critical appraisal. Jurnal Media Syariah, 7 (1), 11-24.
Muzakkir, Thaib, H., Suhaidi, & Abdullah, Z. (2017). Implementation of law in Aceh after application Qanun Jinayah. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6 (9), 1-7.
Myers, D. G. (2012). Social psychology. (Aliya Tusyani, Trans). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Pemerintahan Aceh. (2014). Indeks Hukum Qanun. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://www.acehprov.go.id/hukum/category/2.html.
Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pelaksanaan Hukum Acara Jinayat.
Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat. Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://dsi.acehprov.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Qanun-Aceh-Nomor-6-Tahun-2014-Tentang-Hukum-Jinayat.pdf.
Safinah. (2016). Sanksi hukum terhadap perbuatan liwath dengan anak di bawah umur. Jurnal Petita, 2 (2): 192-213.
Sumiadi & Faisal. (2008). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap pemberlakuan hukum cambuk di wilayah Kota Lhokseumawe dalam rangka penerapan Syariat Islam yang kaffah di Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Jurnal Suloh, 6 (2), 97-174.
Surbakti, N. (2010). Pidana cambuk dalam perpektif keadilan hukum dan hak asasi manusia di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Jurnal Hukum, 3 (7), 456-474.
Sutrisno, I. H. (2016). Case study roles of Islamic law in the perspective of sociological the community Langsa. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4 (9), 69-78.
Taylor, R. (2015). Syariah as heterotopia: Responses from muslim women in Aceh, Indonesia. Religions, 6 (2), 566-593.
Ulya, Z. (2016). Dinamika penerapan hukum jinayah sebagai wujud rekonstruksi Syari’at Islam di Aceh. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 5 (1), 135-148.
Zainuddin, M. (2011). Problematika hukuman cambuk di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh.
Copyright Notice
The Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, Religion, and Humanity is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) License, according to which:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.
